Tuesday 2 December 2008

" Evidence Mumbai Attackers were Anglo-American Intel Operatives"

Well, I always had a feeling it wasn't right.
I think it was last month or maybe 2 months back that there was a story saying how America had chased 2 'terrorists' into Pakistan. This then sprouted the talk that maybe America was looking to drag Pakistan into a conflict on websites such as ATS & INFOWARS.
OH BUT HOW? I wondered, well folks! here we are.
I'm not saying you should directly believe this article as ever there is much research to be done, but it offers a different point of view and that's always helpful.
please read, because after watching the BBC news' coverage of the Georgia / Russia conflict I no longer trust a fucking word it says.


"

Even though these firsthand accounts indicate the attackers were white, drank alcohol and displayed the steely and professional reserve of trained military men, the emerging story carried by the corporate media blames the attacks on al-Qaeda and specifically Lashkar-e-Taiba, one Arab and the other Asian. “A terrorist group with training camps in Pakistan and strong ties with al-Qaeda as well as a history of mounting attacks in India yesterday became the chief suspect behind the atrocities,” reports the Times Online, pointing to Lashkar-e-Taiba.

As the Times Online admits, Lashkar-e-Taiba is a creation of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI. It “receives considerable financial, material and other forms of assistance from the Pakistan government, routed primarily through the ISI. The ISI is the main source of LeT’s funding. Saudi Arabia also provides funds,” explains the South Asia Terrorism Portal. Lashkar-e-Taiba “also played a part in the ISI organized ‘Bosnian campaign against the Serbs,’ which was directed above the ISI by the CIA and British intelligence.”



What should raise your concern as it did mine is the second paragraph. Lots to look up here! but it does directly quote 'Al-Queda' and with that they might aswell have just gone "WE'RE TALKING SHIT!" hah

http://www.infowars.com/?p=6222






0 comments: